WHAT IT TAKES TO BE AN INFORMATION DESIGNER
Friday, August 24th, 2007 | PermalinkThis is a “self-portrait” by Nigel Holmes from Steven Heller’s book, Nigel Holmes on Information Design, that came to me by way of Mark Larson by way of Michael Surtees:

My chart might look like this:
- 25% easy access to both sides of the brain
- 25% drawing and writing treated as equals
15% curiosity10% computer skills- 25% sense of humor
- 25% curiosity about the world
I changed my list. That sense of humor is important — as is curiosity.
Grab my RSS Feed
Follow me on Twitter
More about me & this site
FAQ
E-mail
Tumblr
Flickr
Facebook
Blip.FM
LinkedIn
Visual archives
Categories
June 12th, 2008 at 3:44 pm
http://doorsdown.blogspot.com/
has some of my comix from the 70s and a current comix. I look at them and relate to your questions and thoughts. I also do information design, but within such conservative constraints that the results bore me silly.
March 22nd, 2009 at 1:58 am
I’m what I would term as a ‘traditional’ information designer, working mostly on non-web projects, and my chart would look something like:
• 20% easy access to both sides of the brain
• 20% curiosity about the world/observation
• 15% pedant
• 20% design and writing treated as equals
• 5% computer skills (as I work alone I have to have them)
• 4% sense of humour
• 15% passion for the job
• 1% mathematician
Following of from Zeitguy’s comment that “I also do information design, but within such conservative constraints that the results bore me silly” I think this is largely down to a passion for the kind of work involved. I have no shame in standing up and saying “I design forms” and I find the work fascinating, seeing the ‘conservative constraints’ as a challenge rather than a barrier.
It’s definitely a job that involves a certain type of personality to do it well